Official Singles Chart Update on 7/10/2024

This is exactly why I am falling out of love with the normal UK National chart again and want a new company to take it over again.

A lot of these guys this year has new entry worthy tracks but you guys shove these in our faces as new and re-entries instead of giving us New Modern, New Heritage, New Oldies ie 2024 remastered edition and 2024 Remixes.

It's not about the new music anymore it's about letting the same tracks re-gain entries for unlimited time periods as well as Top 10 by the same acts, tracks and labels again.

Madonna the 80s edition not the Deadpool edition re-entering for a 2nd time this year in the space of only 1 month when it should be you re-enter you are thrown out for a full year no questions asked it should be in the rules guys really on a 2024 modern music chart we have re-entry abuse to dominate a space which could be a Heritage artist 2024 track from the Physical section and the actual current music 2024 tracks for many of these re-entered bands today and yes there is some this week and they put 2022 and 2023 re-entries in for these guys we don't even want or can stand going in past a once per year re-entry rule.

Please change your Top 10 length of weeks on before it is forced dropped, Re-Entries amounts per year and age of tracks rules guys.

I like to see an oldie get in now and then but not unless they are actually re-released properly as a new online singles pack in 2024 which makes it a 2024 track version of it this is fake re-entries that is happening as the tracks are not getting 2024 remastered and they are commiting re-entering abuse for unlimited times this year when it's not a 2024 re-release.

Ok, I'll give Madonna this it is a 2024 track because it has new modern artwork with a 2024 release date and even new 2024 versions as well but the site is only putting up the 80s cover so it's not the 2024 version in the chart so it breaks the age of 2024 re-release but the Deadpool cover release doesn't break 2024 classics vault but it does break it as well because it re-entered for a second time in a month we don't want nonsense 1 month re-entries of anything in our chart.

WE WANT NEW MUSIC!!!!!

That means it must be New 2024 Oldies real Re-Issues, 2024 modern tracks which is actually the correct one to come out as NEW for the artist for the week, 2024 Heritage from the Physicals they are actual new 2024 tracks from our days artists that command respect they deserve the spot on the 2024 chart way more than these re-entries by the same older bands and the remixes a lot were released this year.

We deserve better than how the Kantar Official Charts Company is doing our chart. I'm glad we got Big Top 40, MTV Big Top 20 and MTV Top 20 but none of them work on a full Top 100 of their better charts though thats my issue with the competition it may be better but we don't know half of the 100 chart because under 40 it's hidden from us on the better rivals.

I wouldn't mind them all forming a union and getting this contract though. This group keeps on telling us they are going to get the rest of the mid week charts from when other brand MRIB counted the midweek officially as The Pepsi Chart as well as adding all the Music Week and NME Indie charts and get the Electronic and Disco charts added to the dance vault when they used to be those old names the lazy company didn't do it and they are too lazy as well to filter out these re-entries happening and too lazy to manual put down a track that is dominating for too long making it look like a fight still so we still get excitement but taking the abuse out of it.

Kantar no longer care and I would even go as far as to say it's even unofficial to the rivals now as well because it's got ACR/ACR making 15k-100k tracks go up and then dominate the top at least they can come up with a way to allow 15k-100k to sometimes hit the Top because they are good tracks but put them more to their real levels later to stop but they are too lazy to do it.

I don't mind smaller tracks getting it but it's the fact they let them dominate and don't stick them on their real non altered scores after the tracks been Top 10 for 10 weeks or 5 Weeks Number One which makes it bad.

OK, it's fiddled anyway because 15k-100k is not 256M or 5B but it gives a chance to smaller artists by doing these fiddles which is good for us. But what I object is the amount of weeks these tracks are fiddled for they should be put on their real units after they become chart abuse even stopping their latest new track from even entering these days like a lot of these guys because I checked the artists myself.

For people who love the top 5 this is a dream, for me it's a nightmare 

Not for me