PRO>GEN
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 55,
- Weeks: 4
MAKE IT MINE
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 42,
- Weeks: 5
HYPERREAL
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 29,
- Weeks: 5
MOVE ANY MOUNTAIN
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 4,
- Weeks: 10
LSI
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 6,
- Weeks: 8
EBENEEZER GOODE
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 1,
- Weeks: 9,
- Weeks No. 1: 3
EBENEEZER GOODE
SHAMEN
- Peak: 1,
- Weeks: 1,
- Weeks No. 1: 1
BOSS DRUM
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 4,
- Weeks: 7
BOSS DRUM (REMIXES)
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 58,
- Weeks: 1
PHOREVER PEOPLE
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 5,
- Weeks: 10
RE-EVOLUTION
THE SHAMEN WITH TERENCE MCKENNA
- Peak: 18,
- Weeks: 2
THE SOS EP
THE SHAMEN
- Peak: 14,
- Weeks: 4
DESTINATION ESCHATON
SHAMEN
- Peak: 15,
- Weeks: 6
TRANSAMAZONIA
SHAMEN
- Peak: 28,
- Weeks: 2
HEAL (THE SEPARATION)
SHAMEN
- Peak: 31,
- Weeks: 2
MOVE ANY MOUNTAIN '96
SHAMEN
- Peak: 35,
- Weeks: 3
Join the conversation by joining the Official Charts community and dropping comment.
Already registered?
Log in
No account?
Register
Moncho Monchito
Hola, busco una canción de Shamen en la que usan la música de Harold Faltermeyer (Axel F) que es como un remix electrónico.
O
ohnoitisnathan
You've made a mistake here, with 'Ebeneezer Goode' being listed as two separate releases in 1992 (one charting for a sole week at #1; the other dropping out of the chart from #1 then re-entering at #1 a fortnight later).
Charlie_Jackpot
Yeah the catalogue number is different but they should really merge the two entries
TALLPAUL713
No mistake. It was in the charts for 9 weeks, the songs highest ever position was 1. It slippex out the chart and came back in for 1 week... Its highest position though is still number 1, you see? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ thats how im reading it anyway
Velvet Android
It's definitely a mistake. If you look at the dates and positions it's manifestly the same chart run, as the claimed 'separate' run shows it at Number One in its only week on chart (!), in the middle of the three weeks it spends at Number One in the 'other' run!
According to the page it allegedly went 6-2-1-1 and then dropped out of the Top 100 the next week, to be replaced by itself under a different catalogue number, which itself then disappears altogether the very next week but the 'original' supposedly reenters at Number One and then carries on... which is blatantly nonsense.
Its One Little Indian catalogue number is 78TP7, except for that one week where it's shown as 68TP7 – which surely smacks of someone simply making a typo (hitting the 6 instead of the 7 by mistake) and thereby mucking up the whole thing.
The fact that the error has apparently been on this page for at least 7 years, despite it being pointed out, doesn't breed confidence it'll be fixed any time soon though...