Official Albums Chart on 7/4/2023

“he is attacked because granny's shameful fanatics run a smear campaign to place her above him”

er, no. where are you getting this from?? madonna has absolutely nothing to do with mj’s controversies. that’s just your way of tearing her down again.

“Love is love, and Michael had every right to do whatever he wished to anyone. Being crowned the reigning KING of pop meant normal rules and laws did not apply to him”

i’m seriously concerned for you because pedophilia is not okay, no matter who you are or what position you were/are at. if you think a grown man grooming young boys is okay, then i hope your address isn’t public information, or else armed police will be knocking at your door in record time. and what’s this about “normal rules not applying to him” because of his success? did you hear about donald trump getting arrested? he was a former president. again, laws apply to literally everyone in the world. anyways, this may be the last you hear from me because i want nothing to do with someone who endorses sick bullsh*t like pedophilia.

Michael Jackson is 100% innocent, and there is nothing you can do to change that fact, hater. Children flocked to him because unlike you, Michael was young at heart, pure of mind. Some of us do our research and can see from inside the box. If we need to look at pedos that flaunt their disgusting behavior, Madonna certainly robs cradles as she activity dates men that just barely completed puberty. Granny has undergarments older than most of her boy toys, which she eventually dumps for someone even younger. Laws did not apply to Michael because HE HAD NO CHILDHOOD! Plain, flat and simple. Donald Trump being arrested has nothing to do with the racist witch hunt done to Michael Jackson. By the way, the KING is definitely burning up the charts in 2023. Madonna, not so much.

1. There's no such thing as being "innocent" in a court of law. It's either guilty or not guilty. Maybe you've forgotten about O J Simpson being found not guilty for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman? I suppose he's innocent too?

2. Madonna's fans didn't need to run a smear campaign against Michael Jackson, (some of us actually like his music), he was already trashed by the media in the 80's, due to his strange behaviour. The controversy that later surrounded MJ has nothing to do with Madonna or her fans, but everything to do with MJ and those boys. If you think the hate he received all boiled down to us, you're deluded. Nobody likes celebrities (or anyone else) that does wrong to children. If anyone's running a smear campaign here, it's you against Madonna, and you've been at it for years.

3. "Michael had every right to do whatever he wished to anyone"?
I find that comment outrageous and rather sickening. Nobody has the right to do what they like to anyone, no matter how big of a celebrity they are. I get you enjoy being a troll, but there's something wrong with you, and you need help.

Mr Michael Jackson was investigated for years and found not guilty, which means he was vindicated in court, found 100% innocent.

He walked out of the court room a free man!

Madonna fanatics wage a spear campaign against Michael Jackson because they desire to put her above him in sales. They obviously believe that they can wrestle control from Michael's estate to hijack Michael's numbers and credit them to Madonna.

Michael Jackson legit earned his solid golden crown as KING of all popular music and culture. Many men, women and children would have done anything for Michael's attention, including offering him their bodies, free of charge. Of course, being the most talented, most famous actor, dancer, singer, and songwriter means being a target of lies for MONEY! Very simple and easy to understand, dear. Do not need to speak to a psychiatrist, Madame.

The court didn't used the word "Innocent", they literally said "Not guilty", which is completely different to "Innocent". The fact he was investigated for 10 years by the FBI should be all you need to know. I guess all the p*rnographic books they found with the boys fingerprints all over them means nothing? What about their description of his spotted genitalia? I'm sorry, but I'm not buying this lazy and predictable excuse about people trying to get money out of him. He's no better than Jimmy Saville or Gary Glitter.

Once again, OJ Simpson walked out of court a free man too, and nobody believes he was innocent. MJ had the best lawyer anyone could afford, so he was never going to be found guilty anyway.
and stop blaming Madonna fans for his own actions resulting with the world turning on him. He had no one to blame but himself. and wtf is that comment about men, women and children offering him their bodies, free of charge? You are SICK. They didn't have to offer their bodies because he took them regardless of whether they wanted him to or not. You are quite frankly, the most sickest person I've ever come across. I sincerely hope you don't have any nephews because what you've said is disgusting.

Yes These Charts now are a Joke Even U2 Couldnt Survive 3 Weeks Thank You Stars Great Tune

I don't think people appreciate good vocalists anymore, especially the new gen z. If they did, the Carpenters would be in this chart rather than ABBA

I think it's actually Baby Boomers that are stil listening to Abba.

Oh, God, IT'S back! At the end of the day, she proved you wrong by being on the charts for much longer than a week. Why don't you just admit you're angry about it and move on? Either way, she still remains the biggest selling female artist in the world regardless of your infantile temper tantrums. Comparing her to acts who currently benefit from world tours, residencies and biopics really isn't the drag you think it is, so keep trying lame brain.

Madge wanted to have her own biopic and creative control of the film. Since most all of her films are box office bombs like "Swept Away", the project was apparently scrapped. The narcissist granny wanted to play herself as a young upstart of the eighties. It is like that famous scene in "Sunset Blvd." The granny is ready for her close up shot. Of course, being the biggest selling female act is subjective since ABBA have two female singers in their band that never once took off their clothes to sell a pop record. Marge's hits collections are not on the worldwide charts, month after month, year after year.

lol Ah yes, the Sunset Blvd "joke" everyone uses on Madonna nowadays. We get that you thrive on attention and live your life as a online troll, but you could at least be original, funny and believable for once in your life. Evita, Dck Tracy and A League of Their Own were #1 box office hits, hon. She even won a Golden Globe for Evita and has two Oscar winning songs in her catalogue. As for the biopic, she said on Graham Norton she was approached by various movie studios to make it, and she declined because 1)-The script was nonsensical and the person they hired to direct was a misogynist and 2)-They wanted to sugar coat her story and just focus on the hits. She finally agreed to let them finance it on the basis she could write and direct. It was scrapped because she was taking too long as she found it far to difficult to condense her 40 year career into 120 minutes, but you already know this since you watch her every move. Madonna being the biggest selling female artist isn't up for debate or subjective. lol. I mean, we know Kylie's fans have a hard time accepting truth and reality, but some are clearly close to losing their minds over her scoring 23 more chart weeks than they foolishly predicted. However will you cope if she gets good tour reviews from the critics? Will you be running to write 50,000 word hate essays again, like you did on Amazon? lol

Yeah, "Not Enough Love" charts 23 weeks on mostly the bottom of the UK charts, Sales were dismal, but her fanatics brag as if it means the granny is still at the top. There are plenty of legendary figures that never stripped bare to sell pop records. That is where granny messed up. Her recent plastic surgeries definitely aren't helping matters either. In fact, when she took a tumble off the stage a few years back, millions laughed. It was painfully embarrassing. Granny thinks she is the greatest, which she clearly isn't. Why would that old pig get good reviews, when her most recent tours have been disasters with her showing up four to five hours late to each gig? The public has definitely turned against her, She should hide her ugly face, and cover up that nasty old body. Of course, I don't have an Amazon account, so why would I write a 50,000 word essay on an aging Marge?

Millions hate her for being the pig she is.

it’s not subjective, it’s factual! how much more ridiculous can you get? it doesn’t matter whether you like her or not, madonna sold more than abba, period

. Madonna's fans aren't bragging, and have never been silly enough to say she was still "at the top", we're just happy FEL was on the charts for more than a week, and ended up blasting your stupid prediction to smithereens. Meanwhile, I can't stop laughing at your constant frustration over her "stripping" when it's mandatory for many artists these days, in fact, it was happening long before Madonna came along. Cher and Donna Summer's contributions to name a few. Did they "mess up" too? Haters like you are the only ones that bring up Madonna's surgery because it's just another opportunity to attack her. You're just bitter and jealous asf that she's broken records, taboo subjects and in the history books for her many contributions to music, whereas your faves are nowhere to be found. You calling her an old pig is highly offensive and proves the anger is raging inside of you. At the end of the day, her tour is a worldwide smash, proving the public haven't turned against her, and the majority didn't really care about her being late at all. Lastly, "why write a 50,000 word essay on an aging Marge", well, you've written long essays on here, we've all seen them. Besides, you do have an Amazon account to write vile essays on Madonna's music, don't you, Seb? So stop telling lies.

I presume you're talking to that troll who was on here a few months ago? I'm tempted to unblock him to see what he's wrote, but I'm sure it will be more rubbish about Madonna's face, age yadda, yadda, yadda! lol

Cher and Donna Summer have never stripped out of their clothes to sell pop music. Stop spewing nonsense. Granny knows she is a has been, which is why she still screams for attention by exposing her disgusting body. She is nearly 65 years old and her plastic surgeries have turned her into a monster. As for your claim that a majority of the public does not care that she makes them wait in an arena or nightclub for 4 to 5 hours, I have to strongly disagree. Concerts are a very expensive night out these days and some people have children and/or are expected to be at work the next day. The aging hag has managed to off what is left of her dwindling fan base. Granny believes she is special. Her current record sales confirm what happens to narcissists like granny Madonna. In fact, in the history of the music business, there has never been anyone as nasty as her. Most every decent person in the world would definitely classify Madonna as a pig. Real women artists like Ann and Nancy Wilson, Pat Benatar, The Go Go's, The Bangles, Blondie and many others let the music sell their albums. Madonna told young girls to sleep with old men and keep their babies. She single handedly destroyed millions of lives in the eighties and early nineties with her filth. She influenced other filthy acts like Cardi B.

. Truth hurts I see. Besides, Wtf are you talking about? Cher is known all over the world for wearing very little in order to flog her music. Why would she bother stripping when there's very little there to begin with? and Donna Summer wore revealing outfits in the 70's for performances of "Love to Love You Baby" and simulated org*sm to it. Those sort of performance were going in that direction anyway, regardless of Madonna being one of the first to "undress". You have the audacity to blame her for "Filth" when the likes of Lucille Bogan, The Clovers and the like were singing about c*cksucking and shaved p*ssies since as far back as the 1930's. You obviously know NOTHING about musical history and should learn to keep your mouth shut on things you know nothing about. Madonna isn't doing anything different to what she did decades ago, so spare me the misogynistic faux moral outrage. It's funny how the hatred mostly comes from spiteful, washed up, sour faced (and most likely) 60 year old gay men that's spent decades yearning to become a woman, but never had the guts to fully go there due to their own insecurities and cowardice. Everything you say is riddled with hypocrisy and lies. Madonna is a "Monster" and yet, you idolize a child ********* wax freak who spent the majority of his time either riding a merry go round, applying make up, or ******* ****** ****. How on Gods green earth is this man easier for you to stomach than Madonna pumping her face with fillers and ageing? As for Madonna's tour, you can disagree all you like, I didn't expect you to do anything else, but the fact remains people are shelling out hundreds of £ to see the Queen of Pop even after the late starts, which proves they're still here for her regardless. The tour is a huge success, and you'll simply have to get over it or suffer in solitude. lol. Record sales have plummeted for everyone who isn't Ed or Adele, not just Madonna, you'll see first hand when Kylie releases her next album. lol. And please clarify what makes Madonna a pig when there's people like Elton walking around, someone else you favour over her for some strange reason. Oh and there's those tired old references to Pat Benetar, Blondie and the Go-go's again. If that isn't proof you're the same person that's been spewing on Amazon and all over the forums, I don't know what is.

Yes, and it's more of the same, unfortunately, so don't waste your time.

Madonna once dated the KING of all music and dance, Mr Michael Jackson and tried unsuccessfully to seduce him. The man dated movie starlets like Tatum and Brooke, but had to remove Madonna from his home because she was an overly aggressive pig. She was like a snake spitting out her poisonous venom. Michael Jackson had every right to love anyone he wished, as he EARNED the crown by becoming the greatest selling artist of all time, even surpassing those terrible sixties British mop heads, The Beatles. He did this by working at his craft of musical excellence. Marge stripped down to nothing with pointed leather bras and wore throngs that exposed her sagging buttocks. Other women acts simply wear costumes, Madonna exposes her nasty body to even include her black, greasy armpit hair. So gross. She seems to be a bit of a fan of the racist seventies television series, "Different Strokes" as she buys black children from Africa to raise them in her white as lily home. The reason Michael adopted white children was because of that dreadful stereotype. That woman is utterly disgusting. She abuses her wealth and power. All this is very well known, dear. Michael Jackson died to become the biggest selling posthumous artist in the world, and granny Madonna is simply an old washed up mess. She will never reach his legendary status. She is frankly embarrassing herself at this point. I find it so amusing. I doubt she even knows what year it is. She is soooooo stuck on herself. Again, I don't write essays on Amazon. Look around more outside your small little world. The reality is, granny is hated by millions of people around the international globe. I am not the only man criticizing her filth. You are simply fanatical, unhinged, and delusional.

Yeah I keep blockin the phobe but it comes back on ere with new names or changes iss name.

They keep going on with their bile n vitriol ageism n misogony on ere n aint worth the bother. To many of them types abahrt nahadays n all. I can't wait to see Madge live when she comes over ere.

lmao. You must be stupid to believe he was romantically involved with any of those women. His short marriage to Lisa Marie Presley was a business transaction to quell the rumours. The man was as straight as a bunch of Bananas, and those women were nothing more than his f*g hags. What do you think he meant by keeping it "in the Closet"? I mean, he could've been referring to the stained, crusty adolescent underwear that was hidden, but it's more likely to have been about his sexuality. Madonna said he approached her for this duet, and was shocked by the implication of the title. He obviously wasn't man enough to take her ideas on board, considering the song ended up being just a provocative title stamped on an empty husk of what could've been. They attended the Oscars and hung out a few times - big whoop! and that was only because she was the hottest female artist around at that period. He was simply using her for publicity. I suppose you could say Madonna was using him too, but her name was on everyone's lips back them, so she didn't need him, whereas he'd been out of the public eye for years doing god knows what behind the gates of Neverland. He also tried to ride Prince's coat tails when he was massively popular, but Prince wasn't tolerating any of his BS. Madonna may be aggressive, but I highly doubt she was removed from his house, more like she was banging on the door to get out. lol. At least you get what you see with the Queen of Pop, whereas the p of pop was one of the most disgusting, twisted, sick, and egotistical men to walk the planet, and one that tried to hide his ugliness behind a faux charade - fortunately, all that ugliness began to seep out on to his face in the 90's, revealing his true self to the world. The fact he constantly used fat slurs on Janet, and tried to sabotage his own Brothers career, because he didn't like competition should tell you the type of man he was. Speaking of The Beatles, the reason he and Paul Mcartney fallen out was because he bought the Beatles catalogue out of nastiness. Paul never forgave him for that, and quite right too. MJ's artistry wasn't even that amazing to begin with, since his entire shtick was all due to James Brown and Bob Fosse. Even the moonwalk wasn't his creation, that was Bill Bailey, who first did it in 1943. Nothing about MJ is original, yet the clueless dregs of society like you treat him as some kind of messiah. lol. I mean, at least Madonna never once claimed to be something she wasn't, and wasn't ashamed of generating £ for removing her clothes (as you put it). God forbid he ever unleashed his b/w polka-dot, anorexic body on to the world.
At least Madonna's children seem to have lived a happy life, regardless of her lifestyle. Paris, Prince and Blanket had their faces covered from the get go and have quite frankly turned into a bit of a mess because they were subjected to a life of ridicule thanks to their so called father, not to mention a massive question mark lingering over the paternity. He may be a huge selling artist, but Madonna's sales now fall in the region of around 400 million, and that's nothing to snigger at. To mock and call her "disgusting" for giving her adoptive children an incredible life, says more about you than anything else, especially when you favour someone who literally uses their wealth and power to do what he did. You seem to be far too invested for someone you consider embarrassing and disgusting. I suggest you drop this masquerade. Everyone knows Madonna is a polarizing artist, but stop acting as if you aren't the same person using various accounts to troll her on Amazon, Digital Spy, OCC, ect. Take a look at the reactions you've been getting on here since FEL was released. People are now aware of your , and it's having the opposite effect on Madonna that you desire. Time to focus on things you DO like for a change, even if it is repulsive dead pedo's.

oh look everyone, it’s sheldon cooper back with another rant about madonna aging. firstly, it’s “FINALLY enough love”, i don’t need to repeat myself. what person reads “not” as “finally”? second, how are you going to criticise madonna for getting old, everyone gets there eventually. i see you congratulating elton while you’re at it too - have you SEEN him?! madonna looks fkin young in comparison. third, i see you making claims that michael jackson surpassed the beatles (aka “those terrible sixties british mop heads”, which proves your utter silliness) for most records sold. where are you getting this information? dios mío, if you’re going to make claims about record breakers, at least get a source. no one believes that anyone will be overtaking the beatles for that feat, ever. lastly, how are you gonna call madonna a “monster” simply for wearing little, when 1) that’s been normalised among female artists for decades, and 2) your favourite artist was quite literally a ch*ld m*lest*r. i didn’t want to (i too love michael jackson’s music), but i had to go there because of your shameless hypocrisy and misogyny. no matter what you think of madonna, she’ll always be around, and the fact that you’ve been doing this for years says everything about the no life you are. get a new hobby, like maybe resting your hand on some grass for a change?

Agree with every word, there's no way MJ has surpassed the Beatles. They're above him in sales, as is Elvis Presley. As much as I trashed MJ in my previous post, I can't deny enjoying a lot of his music. He was a child prodigy, but a very damaged individual that turned him into a horrible human being. I really don't get how anyone can say Madonna is far worse than he was. It's scary he thinks that way. and the worst part of about what he said was "Michael Jackson had the right to love who he wished" because he was the King of Pop. Just because he was the King of Pop doesn't give him the right to do what he did. I'm seriously concerned for that person, tbh.

Actually you don't know what you're talking about. There's no evidence that the Beatles or Elis have outsold him, cause there's no sales figures whatsoever to prove it. Even the Guinness books removed them as the best selling artists of all time because EMI and RCA didn't have proof that they'd sold over a billion records each. There was only 270 million certified sales for The Beatles when they looked into it lol.

and here's that delusional fool again with another account. *sigh^

Not another one. Looks like I'll be blocking that one too.

I hope Jessie Ware's new album gets number one!

I don't count positions 76-100 after 1989. On that basis, it was out of the chart in the initial run at the start of October, just 6 weeks after release. 2 re-entries since, both below the top 60. Failing to get #1 too. Hardly the glittering return to form the fans were expecting. 52+ -week runs in the top 75.

Not common for a remix album, no. But probably because remix albums themselves are not common.

So we should all disregard 76-100 because David Carbines says so? lmao. Kylie fans will say anything to discredit Madonna. The only reason Madonna failed to get the #1 was because she didn't promote. Steps were promoting their album up and down the country and working round the clock signing copies. Which reminds me, where's that album now? It hasn't been on the chart for months and the fact they disappeared after getting the #1 speaks volumes. I'm not even sure where this about "fans expecting 52 weeks in the top 75" is coming from, because none of us said that. We're just happy it had as much longevity as it did. It may even go back into the chart when she tours, but I'll expect you and your mental gymnastics will be here throwing some negative light on it, as usual.

Didn't that Jake troll say it would be out of the charts in it's second week? There was another who thought she wouldn't make it past October, yet here we are almost 6 months later. Have these trolls said anything about Madonna's tour selling out yet? I'd love to know their thoughts on that.

but why would you need to discredit positions 76-100? it’s been a top 100 for years, surely you would’ve adjusted to it

Madonna's tour do sell out so it proves that most of her fans don't care much for her music over the last few years it's the 80s,90s and 00s she's best remembered for when she was excellent.

Pity it sold so poorly for 24 wks in the chart.

…no one brought up sales? they just said it would be out the charts real fast. how it’s managed to last for a while is amazing considering she didn’t promote the album (unlike the other two albums that debuted above it), and even if she doesn’t sell as much as she used to she’s still gonna be around whether you like it or not. she’s the queen of pop. cry about it

Why would I cry lol weeks in the charts is not everything if it sells so low because the music industry will notice how much it sells before weeks on charts.

Since when is 24 wks - 8 months.

Because it still isn't. The OCC only prints and publishes top 75 even in their recent yearly books by Martin Talbot, including the 2022 book. Music Week until last year when it went monthly, still only published the top 75 as 'Official'. Anything below that is for internal industry purposes. The only exception being August 1981-January 1989 when it was officially a top 100. Even then the Singles was still only a published top 75, despite recording lower positions to 100.

In terms of industry lists, it's been a top 200 since 1994 when a new surveying company took over (CIN, I think, but could be Mori).

You're crying due to the simple fact Madonna didn't exit the charts as quickly as you predicted, Can't say I'm surprised you're now talking about sales as a means to deflect from your original comments on it's chart longevity. lmao.

The initial run DIDN'T make it past October. We were correct. That's not trolling, but accurate chart predictions. First I've heard of a tour. Selling out or otherwise. But then, I pay no attention to gigs I have no intention of going to!

Yeah I reckon it will go back in n all. Madge done well with er run, she ad a silver album earlier in er career n all but all of er albums ave been disked silver, gold or platinum plus on ere juss goes to show ow she is as popular as ever.

and yet Madame X made 51 Million from a theatre tour, as opposed to the 17M Kylie made from the Golden tour.

In 2005, Music Week and Guinness still regarded 'official' to be top 75 and that is all they published at the time. OCC have retrospectively added the 25 places from 1994-2005 with no explanation when, where or IF the top 100 supercedes the top 75 either during those years or in the 18 since. Infact, Music Week still published a top 75 until it's last weekly edition at the start of last year.

Ah The Brilliant Rain Video

She's 91 in the mid weeks....

You're clearly not even a fan. If you were you'd realize that Madonna despises people who call her ''Madge''.

She outlasted about a thousand new entries though in the six months she hung around the chart so no shame in that at all is there pal?