The Official Charts Company logoThe Official Charts Company
My account
My account

BEATLES WITH BILLY PRESTON

BEATLES WITH BILLY PRESTON Songs stats

UK No1s
1
UK Top 10s
1
UK Top 40s
2
UK Top 75s
2
Weeks at No1
6
Weeks in the Top 10
9
Weeks in the Top 40
19
Weeks in the Top 75
22

BEATLES WITH BILLY PRESTON Hits

Join the conversation by joining the Official Charts community and dropping comment.

Already registered?

Log in

No account?

Register

CS

Common Sense

0
see comment below. Is it any wonder your system doesn't work either. The kids have taken over the asylum and they are rubbish at their jobs. :) Oh I see what they've done. They've employed a data inputter who can't input data. In the middle of Get Back's six week run at number one, they have credited four weeks to "Preston". If you look up "Preston" in the artist list you'll find he has four weeks on the chart, all at number one. No wonder the Beatles' total weeks at number one figure doesn't match Guinness'. Or that McCartney is never credited with his Wings' number one Venus and Mars. Or that the Stones' and Elvis' re-issues are credited as new No 1's but Sgt Pepper isn't. Charts for dummies. Ha ha Broken Britain.

CS

Common Sense

1

Hi Chris, I think you might be confusing the "Official Chart" people with professionals doing a good job.  Given the size of the error, I wondered if there was a conspiracy, but then I realised it was simply another example of poor performance in "Broken Britain".  If you think the error on Get Back is bad, go and see if you can find a little band called "Beatles" in the new UK chart listing at all. I couldn't.  The last one alphabetically before "Beatles and Billy Preston" is "Beatings".  So there you have it, no conspiracy, just good old fashioned ignorance and stupidity. Well done "UK Official charts".  They got caught out trying to hide Kate Bush's popularity too!  How embarrassing for the little dears?      

avatar

Chris Alcroft

0

Why do you insist on crediting get back by The Beatles (with Billy Preston) with just two weeks at no 1 on UK singles chart in 1969.everybody knows it was 6 weeks.
Every copy of the guiness book of British hit singles i possess,rightly credits it as 6 weeks at #1.
Look onto it guys - I find this blatant discrepancy so annoying and infuriating.
Ps: please don't take my post down,like my last one - just because you don't agree !